• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Project Respect

Project Respect

Mutual respect is the bedrock of all human interactions.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About
  • Gold Standard Science
  • Mini-fellowship
    • From Training to Impact: The First Stanford CETR Mini-Fellowship Graduates
    • Mini-Fellowship
  • Training
    • Methods Podcast
    • Understanding Heterogeneity
    • Prediction Analysis
  • Leadership Podcast
  • Contact Us

VJ Periyakoil

June 15, 2026

Pilot Studies

Pilot study is the most problematic term, because there’s so many people who will tell you that any small, badly designed study that leads to no viable conclusions, that’s a pilot study. Any that’s not what a pilot study is. The word pilot is to pilot study, is the same as pilot in pilot boat. A pilot boat is a very small boat that goes out and it leads a huge ship safely into harbor. So the huge ship could be an aircraft carrier, or an oiler, an oil tanker, or it could be a cruise ship. The pilot boat cannot do the function of the big ship, but it’s an absolutely essential leading instrument.

And even if we’ve designed the big ship before we start the pilot study, chances are, when you start working with real patients under real circumstances, you’re going to find that some of the things you planned to do, you can’t. Or some of the things that you planned to do are not ideal. And a pilot study gives you a chance to tweak the design of your big study so you aren’t going to have to deal with these problems after the study starts when it would really be dangerous.

To learn more from Dr. Helena Kraemer listen to the podcast episode below.

Pilot Studies Part 1

Pilot Studies Part 2

 

Click here for more Research Methodology Podcasts

Methodology Podcasts

June 15, 2026

Scientific Methods

The result of a well-done exploratory study is a hypothesis. That’s the formulation of the hypothesis. And it also results in having, giving you the information, you need to design a good study for that hypothesis. Questions like, what populations should I sample? How should I sample it? What measures should I take? How should I design this study? Should it be cross-sectional, longitudinal, etc, all of those types of questions. The answers should be based on what you’ve learned in the exploration phase of the study. 

Next step is a pilot study. So now you have a strong hypothesis with good rationale justification. You have designed a study and the question is whether you can actually do that study. Have you made the right decisions? Can I sample or, draw a large enough sample? Can I use these measurements? Does it take six hours or three hours to get these measurements? Any sort of questions of implementation of that sort becomes a pilot study, which is a feasibility study. You use the results of the feasibility study to tweak your design so that you can do it… 

To learn more from Dr. Helena Kraemer listen to the podcast episode below.

Click here for more Research Methodology Podcasts

Methodology Podcasts

August 23, 2018

Take the Stanford Microvalidation Challenge

Many of us are pretty preoccupied with our wants, needs, and fears. As we live our fast-paced lives, we may unintentionally commit microaggressions that hurt those around us. As the old saying goes,

Be Kind; Everyone You Meet is Fighting a Hard Battle

We invite you to put a stop to microaggressions and replace them with microvalidations. Microvalidations are small verbal and non-verbal responses that indicate understanding, empathy and support of the other person’s plight.

Take the Stanford Microvalidation Challenge Today: 

  1. Ask a question to someone about work (their work, commute, office space, clinical load, research projects, upcoming deadlines etc.)
  2. When they answer, respond with a micro-validation
  3. Watch for their non-verbal and verbal response
  4. Do it again. See how many you can fit into one day

Remember: A micro validation should be subtle, fleeting, genuine. Avoid personal comments about physical attributes.

Using the comments section below, please share with us how you took the Stanford microvalidation challenge and what the response was.

Video Lessons

August 21, 2018

What is micro-communication?

In any encounter, small packets of information are exchanged continuously like a tennis volley. There a minute by minute variation of the information communicated, the underlying affect and the communication effectiveness. As we communicate, we transmit information admixed with microaggressions and microvalidations. The quality of communication is eroded with every microaggression and augmented by each microvalidation.

Communication comprises of both verbal and nonverbal information. Over 90% of the communication is nonverbal. Nonverbal communication is heavily contextual and is influenced by the culture of the communicator. Nonverbal behaviors include eye movements, body posture and movement, tone and cadence of of voice, use of touch, use of silence, use of space and use of artifacts. Skillful use of nonverbal communication can foster effective intercultural interactions.

Effective communication involves awareness and modulation of our microcommunication pattern on an ongoing basis.

Video Lessons

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
© 2023 Stanford Medicine
Privacy Policy • Terms of Use

Project RespectLogo Header Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Gold Standard Science
  • Mini-fellowship
    • From Training to Impact: The First Stanford CETR Mini-Fellowship Graduates
    • Mini-Fellowship
  • Training
    • Methods Podcast
    • Understanding Heterogeneity
    • Prediction Analysis
  • Leadership Podcast
  • Contact Us